检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙宇凝 SUN Yuning(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701)
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院,上海201701
出 处:《绵阳师范学院学报》2021年第1期14-19,共6页Journal of Mianyang Teachers' College
摘 要:重复诉讼问题是我国民事诉讼司法实践中经常面临的问题,虽然“一事不再理”原则在指导原则层面限制重复诉讼,判决的既判力概念也普遍运用于民事诉讼中,但《民事诉讼法》及司法解释对于重复诉讼的立法并没有彻底解决重复诉讼的识别问题与规制问题。从禁止重复诉讼的法理依据出发,通过厘清与禁止重复诉讼密切联系的相关概念,充分发挥禁止重复诉讼区别于一事不再理和既判力概念在诉讼系属中的独特作用。另外,在相关域外立法的视角下反思当前我国禁止重复诉讼制度的局限,有利于完善禁止重复诉讼制度的具体适用,以实现对该制度的多元化规范意义。The problem of repeated litigation is a common problem faced in the judicial practice of civil litigation in China.Although the principle"non bis in idem"restricts repeated litigation at the level of guiding principles,and the concept of res judicata is also commonly used in civil litigation,the civil procedure law and judicial interpretations the legislation of litigation has not completely solved the problem of identification and regulation of repeated litigation.Starting from the legal basis for the prohibition of repeated litigation,by clarifying the related concepts closely related to the prohibition of repeated litigation,this paper points out that the prohibition of repeated litigation is different from principle"non bis in idem"and the particular role of the concept of res judicata in the litigation system.In addition,reflecting on the limitations of China's current system of prohibiting repeated litigation from the perspective of relevant extraterritorial legislation is conducive to perfect the specific application of the system of prohibiting repeated litigation,so as to realize the diversified normative significance of the system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127