朱光潜与科林伍德语言表现论之比较  

A Comparison between Zhu Guangqian and Collingwood’s Theories of Language Expression

作　　者：刘斌 宛小平[1] LIU Bin;WAN Xiaoping(Department of Philosophy,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学哲学系,合肥230039

出　　处：《合肥工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期104-110,共7页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(17ZDA018)。

摘　　要：自克罗齐将语言纳入美学研究以来,语言便逐渐从审美的边缘走向中心。遗憾的是,在克罗齐开启了美学领域的“语言学转向”后,被称为克罗齐美学继承人的科林伍德和推动克罗齐中国化的重要学者朱光潜,二者的语言表现论都未曾引起足够的关注。以克罗齐为“中介”,在朱光潜与科林伍德间建立一种对话关系,去探索二者语言表现论的同与异,以及构成差异的关键因素,将是非常有启发性的工作。Since Croce incorporated language into aesthetics,language has gradually moved from the edge of aesthetics to the center.It is a pity that after Croce started the“linguistic turn”in the field of aesthetics,neither Collingwood,who is called the successor of Croce’s aesthetics,nor Zhu Guangqian,an important scholar who promoted the sinicization of Croce,has attracted enough attention.It will be very enlightening to establish a dialogue relationship between Zhu Guangqian and Collingwood with Croce as the intermediary to explore the similarities and differences between the two theories of language expression and the dominant factors that constitute the differences.

关 键 词：朱光潜 科林伍德 克罗齐 语言 表现说 艺术 

分 类 号：B12[哲学宗教—世界哲学]