论永嘉学派与程朱理学在“道”“法”关系问题上的认识错位——以陈傅良《唐制度纪纲》为个案  

The Different Understanding on the Relation of Tao and Law Between Yongjia School and Chengzhu School

作　　者：王宇[1] Wang Yu(Zhejiang Academy Social Science,Hangzhou 310007)

机构地区：[1]浙江省社会科学院文化研究所、浙学研究中心,杭州310007

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2021年第2期112-117,159,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“多卷本《宋明理学史新编》”(17ZDA013);浙江省社科规划重点课题“求索道与法的统一:永嘉学派思想研究”(20JDZD041)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要："道"与"法"的关系问题是永嘉学派与程朱理学的重要分歧,陈傅良《唐制度纪纲》一文正面披露了两派在"道"与"法"关系问题上的分歧立场,从而引起了程朱理学学者魏了翁的重视和批判。本文即以此文为个案进行分析,认为造成两派在这一问题上的分歧,既由于对"道"的不同阶段的认识错位,也关系到对"道"的不同取义。The issue of the relationship between“Tao”and“Law”is an important difference between Yongjia school and Cheng Zhu Neo Confucianism.Chen Fuliang’s article on the system of Tang Dynasty positively reveals the different positions of the two schools on the issue of the relationship between“Tao”and“Law”,which has aroused the attention and criticism of Wei Liaoweng,a Cheng Zhu Neo Confucianism scholar.This paper takes this article as a case to analyze,and holds that the differences between the two schools on this issue are not only due to the misunderstanding of different stages of“Tao”,but also related to the different meanings of“Tao”.

关 键 词：三代之法 道法关系 朱熹 陈傅良 永嘉学派 

分 类 号：B244[哲学宗教—中国哲学]