刑事瑕疵证据补正规则的完善路径  

The Perfecting Path of the Criminal Defect Evidence Correction Rule

作　　者：周好峰 ZHOU Hao-feng(School of Law,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian Liaoning 116033,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学法学院,辽宁大连116033

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2021年第1期87-90,共4页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘　　要：对瑕疵证据进行补正不仅是为了满足厘清案件事实与保障基本诉权的现实需要,也是稳定社会秩序与实现程序正义的必然要求。欲有效降低瑕疵发生之频率,需规制侦查取证之流程与拓宽监督取证之形式。不仅如此,立法还需发力,一方面可将被追诉者对瑕疵的明示同意增设为治愈瑕疵的路径之一,另一方面应当明确救治瑕疵之程序。为提高侦查人员救治瑕疵的积极性,不妨赋予法官一项处罚建议权。The correction of defective evidence is not only to meet the practical needs of clarifying the facts of the case and protecting the basic right of action,but also to stabilize the social order and realize the inevitable requirements of procedural justice.To effectively reduce the frequency of defects,it is particularly important to regulate the process of investigation and forensics and broaden the forms of supervision and forensics.Moreover,legislation also needs to be strengthened.On the one hand,the express consent of the accused to the defect can be added as one of the ways to cure the defect;on the other hand,the procedure to cure the defect should be clarified.In order to improve the enthusiasm of investigators for treating defects,judges may be endowed with a right to propose punishment.

关 键 词：瑕疵证据 补正规则 侦查取证 

分 类 号：DF713[政治法律—诉讼法学]