组合式形名结构词长搭配和“的”的隐现  

A Study of Word-Length Combinations and Presence/Absence of De(的)in Chinese “A(De(的)) N” Nominals

作　　者：应学凤[1] 端木三[2] YING Xue-feng;DUAN MU San(School of Chinese Studies,Zhejiang International Studies University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310012 China;Department of Linguistics,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor 48109 USA)

机构地区：[1]浙江外国语学院中国语言文化学院,杭州310023 [2]密歇根大学语言学系,安娜堡48109

出　　处：《语言研究》2021年第1期10-15,共6页Studies in Language and Linguistics

摘　　要：关于形名结构的研究存在不平衡现象,黏合式多,组合式少。本文基于语料库,考察组合式形名结构词长搭配和"的"的隐现关系,发现组合式形名结构"A的N"隐"的"能力受词长搭配制约,从低到高为:2+1> 1+2> 2+2,此外,语体对"的"的隐现也有影响。跟薛亚红、端木三(2018)比较发现:2+2式"A的N"最易隐"的","AN"又最易插入"的";2+1式"A的N"很难隐"的",语料库中2+1式"A的N""AN"数量都少;1+1式"AN"多,"A的N"少。从音步屏蔽看,1+2式"AN"不必有"的",2+1式"AN"需要"的"。本文测试结果证实了这个推断:1+2式"A的N"的"的"可隐去,2+1式"A的N"的"的"大多数不能隐。There is an imbalance concerning the study of"A(De(的))N"nominals,with more AN pattern than"A De(的)N"pattern.From a corpus-based perspective,the paper studies the relationship between word-length preference and the presence or absence of De(的)in"A De(的)N"nominals.It is found that influenced by word-length,the invisibility ranking of De(的)is 2+1>1+2>2+2.In addition,style also exerts certain impact on the presence or absence of De(的).After comparing studies of Xue Yahong and Duan Mu San(2018),we have found that on the one hand,2+2[A(de)N]nominals are more likely to have De(的)invisible,while 2+2[AN]nominasl are more likely to take a De(的).On the other hand,2+1"A(De(的))N"nominals are unlikely to have De(的)invisible.In the corpus,we find very few 2+1"A De(的)N"or AN nominals,quite abundant 1+1 AN nominals and a few 1+1"A De(的)N"nominals.In light of foot shelter,1+2 AN nominals don’t require a De(的)while 2+1 AN nominals do.Therefore,the study holds the view that the De(的)in 1+2"A(De(的))N"nominals can be absent,while in most cases,the De(的)in 2+1"A De(的)N"nominals cannot.

关 键 词：形名结构 组合式 词长搭配 “的”的隐现 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]