任意的当事人变更之再认识  

Recognition on the Arbitrary Litigant Alteration

作　　者：李凌[1] Li Ling(不详)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2021年第1期170-180,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC820028)“庭审中心视角下的事实主张阶段化审查模式研究”。

摘　　要：关于任意的当事人变更,学说上存在诉之变更说、复合行为说以及特殊行为说三种观点。我国承袭苏联立法曾对其进行了粗略规定,随后又废止。理论研究及立法规则的缺位引发了制度的异化。从本质上而言,任意的当事人变更是一个关涉诉讼经济与程序保障调和的利益衡量问题。在当下诉讼资源紧缺的司法环境下,其具有不可或缺的重要价值。对任意的当事人变更制度的复位与完善应当跳出现有学说争议的框架,从诉讼经济的理念出发,同时兼顾当事人的主体地位及程序保障,以类型化的视角完成对前提要件及程序效力的规则设置。As to the arbitrary litigant alteration,there are three viewpoints of its character,the theory of alteration of appeal,the theory of compound action and the theory of special action.Our country has inherited legislation from the Soviet Union,but was soon abolished.The absence of theoretical research and legislative rules leads to the alienation of the system.Essentially,the arbitrary litigant alteration is closely related to the reconciliation of litigation economy and procedural safeguard.In the judicial environment where litigation resources are scarce,it has indispensable and important value.The restoration and improvement of the arbitrary party alteration system should break away from the framework of theoretical disputes,proceed from the concept of litigation economy,consider the subject status and procedural safeguard of the parties,complete the rules setting of the prerequisite elements and procedural effectiveness from the perspective of typology.

关 键 词：任意的当事人变更 诉讼经济 程序保障 效力规则 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]