论孔颖达的《丧服》制度礼文诠释  

Kong Yingda's Methods and Features of System and Ritual Text Interpretation of The Mourning Dress

作　　者：邓声国[1] Deng Shengguo(School of Humanities,Jinggangshan University,Ji'an 343009,China)

机构地区：[1]井冈山大学人文学院,江西吉安343009

出　　处：《东方论坛（青岛大学学报）》2021年第1期145-157,共13页Eastern Forum（JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“历代《丧服》诠释研究”(18XZX011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：唐代以后,《丧服》制度及其礼文诠释进入一个集成式发展阶段,颇具超越前代、重构新局的宏大气概,孔颖达《礼记正义》便极具代表性。考察《曾子问》《丧服小记》诸篇相关诠释可见,孔颖达《礼记正义》继承并发展了两汉魏晋南北朝《丧服》学诠释的众多成就,无论是诠释涉略面、诠释理路、诠释体式的选择,还是对此前各家经文诠释纷争见解的选择,都彰显出礼文诠释的独到之处。在《丧服》制度及其礼文的诠释过程中,孔颖达持有自己的诠释出发点和《丧服》制度弘旨观;在疏通申解《丧服》制度礼文及其郑《注》的过程中,他又继承延续并创新性地发展了前人诠释焦点、诠释方法等方面成果,形成一整套独具个性化的诠释理念、诠释方法与诠释特色,对唐代乃至此后《丧服》学的诠释与发展,产生了极大的影响。After the Tang Dynasty,the interpretation of the system and ritual text of The Mourning Dress entered a stage of integrated development,which had a momentum to surpass the previous eras and usher ina new situation.Kong Yingda's Commentary of the Book of Rites is a very typical example,which inherited and pushed further many achievements in the study of The Mourning Dress in the Han,Wei,Jin and the Southern and Northern dynasties.Studies by Kong are unique in the scope,way and form of interpretation,and successful in solving disputes among previous interpreters.In the process of interpreting the classic,Kong had his own starting point of interpretation and overview of the system,integrating predecessors.viewpoints and his own understanding,and thus forming a complete set of unique personalized concepts,methods and characteristics.His achievement had a great influence over later-coming interpretation and development of The Mourning Dress.

关 键 词：孔颖达 《礼记正义》 《丧服》制度 礼文 诠释 

分 类 号：G256.3[文化科学—图书馆学]