权利指向抑或利益指向:纠纷解决机制生成的另一维度  

Right orientation or interest orientation:another dimension of dispute resolution classification method

作　　者：林轲亮[1] LIN Keliang(Law School,Guangxi University,Nanning Guangxi 530004,China)

机构地区：[1]广西大学法学院,广西南宁530004

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2021年第1期102-109,共8页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“合作主义视野中城镇基层纠纷解决实证研究”(13XFX015)。

摘　　要：传统的诉讼与非诉讼纠纷解决机制两分模式不能适应时代发展,权利指向和利益指向两分模式可以揭示纠纷本质。权利指向型纠纷解决机制以权利分配作为纠纷解决的基础,比如诉讼、早期中立评估制度;利益指向型纠纷解决机制则以利益分配作为纠纷解决基础,比如调解制度。不应将权利与利益不同指向的纠纷解决机制发展成双跨不同指向的“全能明星”,制度异化将导致“当判不判”、早期中立评估制度的中立人为促进和解而导致评估失实、以判压调等弊端;理应将颠覆纠纷解决机制本质的因素去除,并应同时做好制度之间的衔接;不应只用单一的调解率来评价纠纷解决机制,而应采用多元化的科学评价体系。The traditional classification method:litigation and ADR,is not suitable to the development of The Times.The classification method of right orientation and interest can discover the nature of dispute.The right orientation dispute resolutions based on rights distribution to resolve disputes,such as litigation and ENE.The interest orientation dispute resolutions based on interest distribution,such as mediation to resolve disputes.The system should not develop different orientation dispute resolutions into“all stars”,that means suit for both disputes resolution,as the system dissimilation might leads to issues,such as enter a judgment improperly,wrong evaluation made by neutral of ENE in order to promote conciliation,using judgment to suppress parties to come to mediation.The system should give up the function which is not suitable to the nature of system and make a good linking up among systems.The people should not use the sole rate of mediation to evaluate mediation,but adopt the diverse scientific evaluation system.

关 键 词：权利指向 利益指向 纠纷解决机制 诉讼 仲裁 调解 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]