中西历史演化叙述模式比较  

A Comparison of Narrative Modes of Chinese and Western Historical Evolution

作　　者：熊江梅[1] Xiong Jiangmei

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学文学院

出　　处：《中国文化研究》2020年第4期42-52,共11页Chinese Culture Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中西叙事传统比较研究”(16ZDA195)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：对人类历史作出整体描述,这在中西历史叙述史上都形成了重要的传统,并因文化传统所导致的对于历史观念的差异性理解,而形成普遍史与通变史的不同叙述模式。西方普遍史叙述模式旨在揭示线性发展背后隐含的"整体性"与"同一性",是西方实质主义哲学观的历史折射;中国循环史叙述模式旨在揭示转易循环背后恒久不变的"道"或"理",是通变哲学观下形成的"有限的历史主义"。二者均可视为历史演化之"应然"的叙述"表现"。The overall description of human history has formed an important tradition in the history of Chinese and western narrative history, and formed different narrative modes of universal history and general history due to the different understanding of historical concepts caused by cultural traditions. The western history narrative mode characterized by universal narration aims to reveal the "integrity" and "identity" hidden behind linear development, which is the historical refraction of the western philosophy of essentialism. The Chinese history narrative mode characterized by circular narration aims to reveal the eternal tao(path) or li(reason) behind the transformation of easy circulation, which is the "limited historicism" formed under the general change philosophy. Both of them can be regarded as "should be" narrative "manifestations" of historical evolution.

关 键 词：历史演化 普遍史 循环史 实质主义 通变观 

分 类 号：K107[历史地理—历史学]