检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘飞宏 梁军 汪雅 张晨[2] LIU Fei-hong;LIANG Jun;WANG Ya;ZHANG Chen(Departmeret of Plastic Surgery,Chengdu Mylike Cosmetic Hospial,Chengdu 610000,China)
机构地区:[1]成都美莱医疗美容医院整形外科,四川成都610000 [2]大连大学附属新华医院整形外科研究所,辽宁大连116000
出 处:《中国美容整形外科杂志》2021年第1期29-32,共4页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨加强型连续埋线法重睑成形术与传统连续埋线重睑成形术对比的优势。方法自2018年7月至2019年7月,成都美莱医疗美容医院整形外科将就诊的200例单睑者随机分成A、B两组,每组各100例。A组行加强型连续埋线重睑成形术;B组行传统连续埋线重睑成形术。术后1年由术者对手术效果满意度进行评价。结果 200例患者中181例获随访1年以上。其中A组92例,上睑皮肤轻度松弛者41例,无上睑皮肤松弛者51例;B组89例,上睑皮肤轻度松弛者40例,无上睑皮肤松弛者49例。术后1年,A组手术效果满意度高于B组(P<0.05)。结论加强型连续埋线重睑成形术手术效果满意度高于传统连续埋线重睑成形术,具有广泛的应用价值。Objective To explore the advantage of strengthened continuous buried suture compared with traditional continuous buried suture in blepharoplasty. Methods From July 2018 to July 2019, 200 patients with single eyelid were randomly divided into group A and B, 100 patients in each group. The strengthened continuous buried suture was performed in group A and traditional continuous buried suture was performed in group B. The satisfaction of surgical efficacy was evaluated by surgeons at 1 year after operation. Results A total of 181 patients were followed-up for more than 1 years. Group A(92 patients) containing 41 patients with mild skin laxity of upper eyelid and 51 patients without skin laxity of upper eyelid. Group B(89 patients) including 40 patients with mild skin laxity of upper eyelid and49 patients without skin laxity of upper eyelid. The satisfaction rate of surgical efficacy of group A was higher than that of group B(P<0.05).Conclusion The surgical efficacy of strengthened continuous buried suture is higher than that of traditional continuous buried suture in blepharoplasty. This method has wide application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147