存现宾语的零形回指及其认知语言学解释  

Accessing Zero Anaphoric Antecedents to the Object NP in Chinese Existential-Presentative Construction and their Cognitive Interpretations

作　　者：蒋平[1] JIANG Ping(School of Foreign Languages,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学外国语学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2021年第1期22-30,共9页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

摘　　要：关于汉语零形回指的先前研究多重视主语及相关位置上的先行语,对宾语为先行语的零形回指关注很少。基于自建的汉语零形回指语料库,本研究发现宾语为先行语的零形回指范畴中的一个主要类型是存现宾语的零形回指,与其他结构中的主宾语情况相反,在存现结构中宾语为先行语的零形回指远高于主语为先行语的零形回指。本文认为认知语言学的图形-背景关系理论以及主题性等观点可以充分解释汉语存现宾语比其主语更具认知突显性以及在零形回指中获得更高可及性问题。Previous studies on zero anaphora in Chinese focused largely on antecedents in the subject and relevant positions while little attention has been given to antecedents in the object position of a clause.Based on the analysis of data collected in our corpus of Chinese zero anaphors,this research found that an important type of zero anaphors with antecedents accessed to the object NPs of a clause in Chinese discourse is the one whose antecedents are the object NPs in existential-presentative construction,where,contrary to the general situation in other constructions,zero anaphors are highly accessed to the object NPs rather than the subject NPs.Figure-ground segregation,topicality and relevant cognitive linguistic views are applied to interpret the obvious prominence that the object NP has over the subject NP in existential-presentative construction and the motivations for it to have clearly a higher accessibility to zero anaphors than the NP in the subject position.

关 键 词：存现宾语 零形回指 图形 突显 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]