检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴畅[1] WU Chang(Law Department,Professional College of Hunan Judicial Policeman,Changsha Hunan 410131,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南司法警官职业学院法律系,湖南长沙410131
出 处:《长沙大学学报》2021年第1期72-76,共5页Journal of Changsha University
摘 要:在知识产权大发展背景下,我国知识产权司法和执法状况较之以前有很大改观,但刑事追诉情况仍不理想,刑事自诉没有发挥应有的作用。造成知识产权犯罪自诉适用不足的原因主要有因立案条件高,自诉人举证难,法院调取证据难而导致的客观上立案困难,以及自诉人主观上自诉意愿不足。应适度降低立案条件,充分利用刑事侦查资源,调取行政执法证据,注重专家介入庭审,发挥行业组织的作用,多头并举提高自诉积极性。Under the background of the great development of intellectual property,the judicial and law enforcement situation of intellectual property in China has been greatly improved,but the criminal prosecution situation is still not ideal,and the criminal private prosecution has not played its due role.The reasons for the inadequate application of private prosecution of intellectual property crimes are mainly due to the high filing conditions,the difficulty in presenting evidence,the objective difficulty in filing a case because of the difficulty in obtaining evidence from the court,and the insufficient subjective willingness of private prosecution.To improve the initiative of private prosecution,it is suggested to reduce the conditions for filing cases appropriately,make full use of criminal investigation resources,obtain administrative law enforcement evidence,pay attention to the involvement of experts in court trials,play the role of industry organizations and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.178.2