对比观察铸瓷嵌体与全瓷冠在短冠后牙修复中的临床疗效  

To compare the clinical effect of cast ceramic inlay and all ceramic crown in the restoration of short crown posterior teeth

作　　者：邵献昆 Shao Xiankun(Stomatology Department,Fuheyuan Community Health Service Station of Yongshun Town,Tongzhou District,Beijing City,Beijing 101100)

机构地区：[1]北京市通州区永顺镇富河园社区卫生服务站口腔科,北京101100

出　　处：《中国社区医师》2021年第6期58-59,共2页Chinese Community Doctors

摘　　要：目的:比较短冠后牙修复中采用铸瓷嵌体和全瓷冠的临床效果。方法:选取2015年1月-2019年4月行根管治疗后的牙冠过短患者300例,随机分为两组,各150例。观察组采用铸瓷嵌体修复;对照组全瓷冠修复。比较两组修复效果。结果:两组修复体美观度、边缘密合度、基牙保存情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组修复体折裂和脱落的治疗有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组牙龈指数、菌斑指数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与全瓷冠修复相比,铸瓷嵌体修复短冠后牙的临床效果更好。Objective:To compare the clinical effect of cast ceramic inlay and all ceramic crown in the restoration of short crown posterior teeth.Methods:From January 2015 to April 2019,300 patients with short crowns after root canal therapy were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 150 cases in each group.The observation group was restored with cast porcelain inlay,while the control group was restored with all ceramic crowns.We compared the repair effect of the two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in aesthetic degree of prosthesis,marginal fit and abutment teeth preservation between the two groups(P>0.05).In the observation group,the effective rate of fracture and detachment of restoration was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in gingival index and plaque index between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Compared with all ceramic crown restoration,the clinical effect of cast porcelain inlay on posterior teeth with short crown is better.

关 键 词：短冠后牙 铸瓷嵌体 全瓷冠 修复 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R783.3[医药卫生—口腔医学]