被告人认罪认罚反悔问题研究  

Research on the Defendant’s Estoppel after Pleading Guilty and Punishment

作　　者：张小燕 黄博儒 Zhang Xiaoyan;Huang Boru

机构地区：[1]广东省河源市人民检察院,广东河源517000 [2]西南政法大学,重庆400031

出　　处：《行政与法》2021年第1期103-112,共10页Administration and Law

基　　金：2019年广东省检察理论研究课题“认罪认罚后被告人反悔问题研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:GDJC201927。

摘　　要：自认罪认罚从宽制度实施以来,被告人认罪认罚反悔问题引发了学界热议。从效果上看,被告人反悔权是一把"双刃剑",其有助于保障被告人认罪认罚的自愿性,确保认罪认罚案件的质量,但被告人滥用反悔权造成的负面影响亦不容忽视。为避免认罪协商程序运行受阻,有必要从规范反悔权行使、完善量刑激励制度、强化法律文书的释法说理、发挥值班律师作用、加强自愿性审查与监督、恰当使用认罪供述证据等方面构建被告人反悔应对机制,以减少被告人反悔机率。Since the implementation of leniency system for guilty plea,the issue of the defendant’s confession and repentance has aroused heated discussion in the academic circles.From the perspective of effect,the defendant’s act of estoppel is a"double-edged sword".The right of estoppel helps to protect the defendant’s willingness to plead guilty and to ensure the quality of the cases of confession and punishment.However,the negative impact caused by the defendant’s abuse of the right of estoppel can not be ignored.In order to avoid the obstruction of the plea bargaining process,it is necessary to standardize the exercise of the right of estoppel,improve the sentencing incentive system,strengthen the interpretation and reasoning of legal documents,and play the role of lawyers on duty to improve the defendant’s estoppel response mechanism,so as to reduce the probability of the defendant’s estoppel.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 被告人 认罪认罚反悔 有罪答辩 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]