检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李智[1] 张静 LI Zhi;ZHANG Jing(Fuzhou University Law School,Fuzhou,Fujian 350000,China)
出 处:《时代法学》2021年第1期70-78,共9页Presentday Law Science
基 金:2017国家社科青年基金项目“国际体育自治的法治化研究”(17CFX049)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:作为一项重要的减免责事由,风险自负原则更适应体育活动的特点,适合解决体育运动伤害归责问题。当前,我国学校体育伤害面临着过失认定不明、责任划分不清、公平原则过度适用等问题,以风险自负解决学校体育纠纷,具有特别意义。在学校体育伤害中正确适用风险自负原则,需分清固有风险的范围,明确各方责任,采用以客观标准为准则、辅之主观标准的过失认定方法,并将公平责任类型化,进而平衡学校、家长、学生三方的权益。As an important source of liability relief,the principle of risk-taking is more adapted to the characteristics of sports activities.At present,China's school sports injury is faced with the difficulties of uncertainty of negligence and unclear division of responsibility,and it is of special significance to solve school sports disputes.The correct application of the principle of risk-takingin school sports injury needs to distinguish the scope of inherent risks,clarify the responsibilities of all parties,and adopt the negligencedetermination criteria of objective criteria,supplemented by subjective criteria,so as to balance the rights and interests of schools,parents and students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33