检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康噶·崔臣格桑 Khangkar Tshultrim Kelsang(Otani University of Japan;journal of China Tibetology)
机构地区:[1]日本大谷大学 [2]中国藏学研究中心
出 处:《中国藏学(藏文版)》2020年第4期31-41,共11页CHINA TIBETOLOGY
摘 要:克珠·诺桑嘉措说:“曾经,印度和西藏有论师认为如幻成理派承认现空两俱为胜义谛,宗喀巴大师在其论著《胜观》中对此作出了有力的反驳,但并未反驳中观派分为如幻成理派和极无所住两派,即前者为自续派,后者为应成派”。文章简要论述宗喀巴大师等藏族传统学者对上述有关承认如幻成理派为自续派、极无所住派为应成派之观点。mKhas-grub Nor-bzang-rgya-mtsho has said:“There were commentators in India and Tibet believed the school of admitted both appearance and emptiness as ultimate truth.Tsongkhapa strongly refuted this view in his work,but he didn’t refute the Madhyamaka faction is divided into Prasangika and Svatantrika.”This article briefly discusses the views of traditional Tibetan scholars including Tsongkhapa towards those statements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7