检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙凡松[1] 蹇明[1] 宋泳萩 SUN Fan-song;JIAN Ming;SONG Yong-qiu(School of Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China)
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院,成都611756
出 处:《交通运输工程与信息学报》2021年第1期66-70,92,共6页Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(18BGL104)。
摘 要:本文考虑了两条由两个制造商和两个零售商所组成的竞争性供应链,制造商对一级市场未销售完的产品进行回收再制造后,再通过零售商销往二级市场,且再制造成本与回收努力负相关。在此基础上研究了链与链竞争环境下的最优努力投入、定价决策及制造商是否应投入回收努力的问题,并分析了消费者的价格敏感性变化对制造商和零售商的决策行为和利润的影响。研究发现,竞争性供应链存在唯一的纳什均衡解;若一条链上的消费者对另一条链上的零售价格越敏感,则这条链上制造商的努力水平、零售商的零售价格及二者的利润均会越大;较两制造商不投入回收努力而言,投入合适的回收努力可使得二者的利润获得帕累托改进。This paper examines two competitive supply chains composed of two manufacturers and two retailers.In particular,the manufacturer recycles the products not sold in the primary market and then sells them to the secondary market through retailers.The manufacturing cost is negatively correlated with the recovery effort.In addition,the optimal effort input and pricing decision-making problem in the chain and chain competitive environment are investigated,and the influence of the change in price sensitivity of the consumer on the decision-making behavior and profit of the manufacturers and retailers is analyzed.Results show that the only Nash equilibrium solution existed in this competitive supply chain;if consumers on one chain are more sensitive to the retail price on the other,the level of effort of manufacturers,price of retailers,and profit of both manufacturers and retailers in this chain become greater.Thus,investing in the correct recovery effort can improve the profits of both retailers compared to those of the two manufacturers that do not invest in recycling efforts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.102.182