检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王冠 Wang Guan(The People's Hospital of Tongshan District,Xuzhou City,Jiangsu Xuzhou 221000)
出 处:《中国社区医师》2021年第7期60-61,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:分析锥形束C(CBCT)结合微创技术与传统技术拔除上颌埋伏多生牙的临床效果。方法:2018年1月-2020年8月收治上颌埋伏多生牙患者40例,随机分为两组,各20例。对照组采用传统拔除技术;试验组采用CBCT结合微创技术。比较两组手术时间、术后疼痛程度、肿胀程度以及并发症发生率。结果:试验组手术时间、术后疼痛评分、肿胀程度及并发症发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与传统技术拔除上颌埋伏多生牙相比,CBCT结合微创技术的应用,可以减少手术时间,降低术后疼痛和肿胀程度,降低并发症发生率。Objective:To analyze the clinical effect of CBCT combined with minimally invasive technique and traditional technique in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth.Methods:From January 2018 to August 2020,40 cases of patients with impacted supernumerary teeth were enrolled,they were randomly divided into two groups with 20 cases in each group.The control group used traditional extraction technique.The experimental group used CBCT combined with minimally invasive technology.The operative time,postoperative pain level,swelling degree and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operative time,postoperative pain score,swelling degree and the incidence of complications in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with the traditional technique,CBCT combined with minimally invasive technique in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth can reduce the operative time,reduce the degree of postoperative pain and swelling,it also can reduce the incidence of complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117