检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阎海峰[1] 王墨林 苏聪 Yan Haifeng;Wang Molin;Su Cong(School of Business,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China)
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2021年第3期123-132,共10页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“优势还是劣势?母国专有优势对中国企业海外合法性影响研究”(71972072);上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“后发企业通过跨国并购提升自主创新能力的匹配研究”(2018BGL028)。
摘 要:本文以制度理论为基础,通过对2005—2018年中国企业实施的249起跨国技术并购事件的分析,深入探讨知识产权制度距离对跨国技术并购持续时间、股权选择的影响。研究发现:①知识产权制度距离与并购持续时间呈倒U型关系,即随着知识产权制度距离的增大,并购持续时间先延长后缩短;②知识产权制度距离与并购股权比例呈U型关系,即在知识产权制度相似和相异程度较大的东道国,中国企业通常会选择高股权并购模式。本研究丰富了制度距离和企业跨国并购的相关研究,识别出知识产权制度距离影响中国企业跨国技术并购过程的拐点。Based on the 249 cross-border technology acquisitions undertaken by Chinese firms from 2005—2018,this study,drawing on institutional theory,examines the impact of intellectual property rights institutional(IPRI)distance on the completion duration and equity choice of cross-border technology acquisitions.The results reveal that:①There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between IPRI distance and the completion duration of M&A,in other words,with an increase in IPRI distance,the completion duration of M&A increases firstly and then decreases;②There is a U-shaped relationship between IPRI distance and the equity ratio of M&A,in other words,in host countries with very similar or different levels of intellectual property institutions,Chinese firms are more likely to choose high-equity acquisitions.This study enriches the research on institutional distance and cross-border M&A,and uncovers the turning point of IPRI distance affecting the cross-border technology acquisitions of Chinese firms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46