检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都理工大学法学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2021年第1期48-51,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence
基 金:四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项资助项目“患者近亲属行使知情同意权研究”(项目编号:YF18-Y20)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:现实生活中知情同意权更多地是患者近亲属行使而非患者自己,这种异化现象原因有二:为从近亲属处顺利获得医疗费的支付和预防医疗损害发生后近亲属的“医闹”,医院选择了患者近亲属;患者近亲属与治疗密切相关,往往也主动参与到知情同意中去。但医院的这种“理性”选择和患者近亲属的越俎代庖,都损害了患者的利益,应予匡正。In real life,the right of informed consent is more exercised by the patient's close relatives than by the patient himself.There are two reasons for this dissimilation:in order to get the payment of medical expenses from the close relatives smoothly and prevent the close relatives'medical disturbance after the occurrence of medical damage,the hospital chose the close relatives;patients'close relatives are closely related to the treatment and often actively participate in informed consent.However,the rational choice of the hospital and the longterm poaching by the pa⁃tient's close relatives have damaged the patient's interests and should be corrected.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D923[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222