审查逮捕程序中的阅卷权:比较与借鉴  

Right of Access to Case File in Review of Arrest Procedure:Comparison and Reference

作　　者：利月萍 LI Yueping(不详)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《江汉大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第2期13-25,125,共14页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：华东政法大学研究生创新项目“刑事远程视频庭审制度研究”(2020-5-020)。

摘　　要：我国被追诉人在侦查期间的审查逮捕程序中不享有阅卷权,这种羁押阅卷权的缺失,压缩了辩护权的发挥空间,掣肘审查逮捕程序诉讼化的改造,造成认罪认罚中控辩失衡。为了维护被追诉人在审查逮捕中的程序主体地位,完善审查逮捕程序的正当性以及保证认罪认罚的自愿性,在借鉴域外羁押阅卷制度的基础上,并结合我国的立法和司法实践,扩张我国现行的阅卷制度,赋予被追诉人有限的羁押阅卷权。辩护人(包括值班律师)以及无辩护人的被追诉人在审查逮捕程序中行使阅卷权、阅卷范围仅限于与逮捕相关的事由及证据、基于特殊利益的需求须在一定程度上限制该阅卷权的行使、构建现场阅卷和电子化阅卷的方式。赋予被追诉人有限的羁押阅卷权将有利于在审查逮捕程序中贯彻控辩平等、有效辩护的基本诉讼理念,保障被追诉人的人身自由权,使其不受控方的非法羁押。In China,the defendant does not have the right of access to case files during the review of arrest procedure.The absence of the right compresses the right of defense,hinders the litigation reform of the review of arrest procedure,and causes the prosecution and defense imbalance in the plead-guilty-andpunishment process.In order to protect the procedural subject status of the defendant in the review of arrest,improve the legitimacy of the review of arrest procedure,and ensure the voluntariness during the plead-guilty-and-punishment process,the current institution of access to case files in China should be expanded based on a reference to foreign systems about access to case files during custody as well as China’s own legislative and juridical practice;the purpose is to give the accused a limited access to case files while in custody.This includes the right of access to case files during the review of arrest procedure by the defender(including the duty counsel)and the accused without a defender,the field of access being limited to only the matters and evidence related to the arrest,the right of access to case files being limited to an extent based on the requirement of special interests,and the establishment of on-site and electronic means of access to case files.Endowing the defendant a limited access to case files while in custody is beneficial to implementing such litigation concepts as equality between prosecution and defense and effective defense in the review of arrest procedure;it can protect the defendant’s right of personal liberty and avoid illegal arrests.

关 键 词：阅卷权 审查逮捕 控辩平等 有效辩护 自愿性 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]