检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程鹏 CHENG Peng(不详)
机构地区:[1]上海社会科学院城市与人口发展研究所,200020
出 处:《国外社会科学前沿》2021年第3期68-80,共13页JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCES
摘 要:维护社会公平正义是中国特色社会主义的内在要求,是社会治理的目标和公共政策的重要价值标准。由于社会情境的多元性,从普遍的价值取向到具体的政策实践,需要更具操作性的社会公平正义政策评价标准。梳理西方政治哲学领域的社会公平正义理念内涵,可以概括为功利主义、自由主义和多元主义三个传统,契约主义和比较主义两种视角,程序正义与结果正义两个范畴。以此为脉络,基于马克思主义公平正义观的现实性、历史性和辩证性,从促进社会公平正义的维度评价社会治理领域的各项公共政策,提出应当建立适应多元社会情境的社会公平正义绩效动态评估机制,聚焦帕累托改进并兼顾中国文化特色与当代社会语境。Maintaining social fairness and justice is an inherent requirement of socialism with Chinese characteristics, one of the goals of social governance and an important value standard of public policy. Due to the diversity of social contexts, from universal value orientation to specific policy practice, more operational social fairness and justice policy evaluation standards are needed. This article combs the connotation of the concept of social fairness and justice in the field of Western political philosophy, and summarizes it into the three traditions of utilitarianism, liberalism and pluralism, two perspectives including contractualism and comparativism, and two categories including procedural justice and outcome justice. Based on the realistic, historical and dialectical nature of Marxist view of social fairness and justice, evaluate the various public policies of social governance from the perspective of promoting social fairness and justice, this paper proposes a dynamic evaluation mechanism of social fairness and justice performance to adapt the multi-social situation, focusing on Pareto improvement, taking into account Chinese cultural characteristics and contemporary social context.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49