不同引导任务对图-字Stroop效应的影响——对注意力敏感模型的验证  

The influence of induction tasks on the figure-word Stroop effect——Verification of the Attention Sensitization Model

作　　者：熊建萍[1] 张岳瑶 Xiong Jianping;Zhang Yueyao(Educational College,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China;Psychological College,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China)

机构地区：[1]河南师范大学教育学部,河南新乡453007 [2]深圳大学心理学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《河南师范大学学报（自然科学版）》2021年第2期93-99,共7页Journal of Henan Normal University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(16BYY071);河南省教育厅2017年度教师教育课程改革研究重点项目(2017-JSJYZD-017);河南省科技厅科技攻关重点项目(9210231027).

摘　　要：将引导任务与图-字Stroop任务相结合,通过考察不同引导任务对Stroop效应的影响来探讨注意是否影响自动化加工,以及如何影响的问题,以进一步验证注意力敏感模型.两个实验的结果发现:引导任务与Stroop任务中的条件匹配之间存在显著的交互作用;不同引导任务对Stroop效应量的影响不同,语义引导任务下的Stroop效应量明显高于知觉引导任务;引导任务下的反应时间显著高于无引导任务,正确率恰好相反.结论:实验结果与注意力敏感模型相符.注意系统对自动化加工具有调节作用.这种调节作用是通过增加对相关通路的敏感性,减低无关通路的敏感性来实现的.In current study the induction task paradigm combined with the figure-word Stroop task paradigm was implemented.We attempted to verify whether the regulation mechanism of attention to automatic processes conforms the Attention Sensitization Model by observing the influence of semantic and perceptual induction tasks in the previous induction tasks on semantic and perceptual processes in the subsequent Stroop tasks.The results indicate:The interaction of induction tasks and conditional matching in Stroop tasks was significant.Different induction tasks have different effects on the Stroop effect-size,and the Stroop effect-size under the condition of semantic induction was significantly larger than that in perceptual.The reaction time for induction tasks was markedly larger than that for non-induction task,but the accuracy was opposite.Conclusion:The results of present study supported the view of the Attention Sensitization Model.Attention system can modulate the automatic processes by means of changing the sensitivity of related and unrelated pathways.

关 键 词：引导任务 注意力敏感模型 STROOP效应 自动化加工 

分 类 号：B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]