论训诂二法之局限——以王叔岷《古籍虚字广义》中“以”犹“虽”、“与”为“其”为例  

On the Limitation of the Two Exegetical Methods:Take“以”is“虽”&“与”is“其”of Wang Shumin,s Guji Xuzi Guangyi as Instances

作　　者：王路宁 WANG Luning(Liberal Arts College,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《湖南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期121-128,共8页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：王叔岷《古籍虚字广义》一书阐发“新义”时多采用传统训诂二法“互文”及“异文”。“互文”的局限在于互训的两词应满足在句中句法分布相同的条件,不满足此条件的结论通常有误,如《广义》中释“以”犹“虽”有误;“异文”的局限在于比对时的语句当选取同类型结构语句,而非仅选取描述同一事件的语句,否则结论一般有误,如《广义》中释“与”为“其”有误。The“new meaning”in Wang Shumin’s Guji Xuzi Guangyi mostly developed by the two traditional exegetical methods of“intertextuality”and“distertextuality”.The limitation of intertextuality lies in the fact that the two words of intertextuality should meet the condition of the same syntactic distribution in the sentence,and the conclusion that does not meet this condition is usually wrong,such as the wrong interpretation of“以”is“虽”in Guangyi;the limitation of“distertextuality”lies in that the same type of structural sentence is selected for comparison rather than only the sentence describing the same event,otherwise the conclusion is generally wrong,such as the wrong interpretation of“与”is“其”in Guangyi.

关 键 词：《古籍虚字广义》 王叔岷 互文 异文互训 词汇传统训诂 

分 类 号：H131[语言文字—汉语]