检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李俊才 Li Juncai(School of Law,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)
出 处:《黑河学院学报》2021年第2期33-36,共4页Journal of Heihe University
摘 要:司法中心主义法学研究范式让中国法学教育过度的为司法实践提供支持,但在解决实际司法实践问题时还是显得力不从心,并且这种研究范式和中国现实状况的契合存在脱节。契合立法、行政、人民利益的法学研究范式都有自身存在的必要,这三种研究范式作为法学研究思维都对法学研究有促进作用,为了转变这种一切以司法为导向的法学研究思维,法学教育需要从立法、实务、法学研究三个方面率先进行改变,在进行更深层次上的司法改革后,促进法学研究成果的实践转换,同时努力促进多研究范式的共同发展。Judicial-centered legal research paradigms can provide Chinese legal education with enough support for judicial practice,but still being incapable of solving practical judicial practice problems;what’s more,the research paradigms is out of touch with the reality of China.The three legal research paradigms that fit the legislation,administration,and people’s interests are viewed legal research thinking and have a promoting effect on legal research;therefore,the three research paradigms all have the necessity of their own existence.In order to change all this judicialoriented legal research thinking,legal education needs to take the lead in changing from three aspects of legislation,practice,and legal research.After deeper judicial reforms,there is a need to promote the practical transformation of legal research achievements,and to strive to promote the common development of multiple research paradigms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222