检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐涛[1,2] 李丽曼 刘云松[3] 危伊萍 胡文杰[2] XU Tao;LI Liman;LIU Yunsong;WEI Yiping;HU Wenjie(Department of Emergency,Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China;Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China;Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院急诊科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,国家口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081 [2]北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙周科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,国家口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081 [3]北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,国家口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2021年第3期264-268,共5页Journal of Oral Science Research
基 金:北京市科学技术委员会首都临床特色应用研究基金(编号:Z161100000516042);北京大学临床科学家计划专项(编号:BMU2019LCKXJ010)。
摘 要:目的:评价重度牙周炎磨牙进行微创拔牙和微翻瓣位点保存术后植体负重1年的效果。方法:纳入2015年1月~2017年1月于牙周科就诊的18名患者共20颗磨牙,种植修复后负重1个月(基线)和12个月对种植牙进行临床检查,记录菌斑指数(silness&leo plaque index,PLI)、植体周软组织探诊深度(peri-implant probing depth,PPD)、出血指数(mazza bleeding index,BI)、颊侧角化组织宽度(width of keratinized tissue,KTW);基线和负重1年拍摄平行投照根尖片测量边缘骨丧失(marginal bone loss,MBL)。结果:20颗种植修复体负重1年后存留率和成功率为100%。负重即刻和负重1年PLI、PPD、BI、KTW变化均无统计学差异(P>0.05),MBL为(0.12±0.24)mm。结论:微翻瓣位点保存术后种植修复负重1年获得了良好的临床效果。Objective:To evaluate the effects of implants following minimally invasive extraction and minimal flap in ridge preservation at molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis after 1 year load.Methods:Eighteen patients with a total of 20 molar extraction sockets were recruited in the study from January 2015 to January 2017.At 1-month(baseline)and 1-year post-load,each implant was examined with the following parameters:plaque index(Silness&Leo Plaque Index,PLI),peri-implant probing depth(PPD),bleeding index(Mazza,BI),and width of keratinized tissue(KTW).Parallel periapical radiographs were taken at baseline and 1-year post-load to evaluate the peri-implant marginal bone loss(MBL).Results:The survival rate and success rate were 100%for 20 implants.There were no statistically significant differences in the PLI,PPD,BI,and KTW between baseline and 1-year post-load(P>0.05).MBL was(0.12±0.24)mm(P>0.05).Conclusion:The clinical outcomes of implant restoration were favorable following minimal flap and ridge preservation at molar extraction sockets with severe periodontitis after 1-year load.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.114