三种不同糊剂在根管治疗中的临床效果比较  

Comparison of Clinical Effects of Three Different Pastes in Root Canal Treatment

作　　者：郑义稳[1] ZHENG Yiwen(Lingshan County People’s Hospital,Lingshan 535400,China)

机构地区：[1]灵山县人民医院,广西灵山535400

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2021年第6期120-122,共3页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

基　　金：钦州市科学研究与技术开发科技攻关课题项目(201410719)。

摘　　要：目的:评价不同糊剂在根管治疗中的临床疗效。方法:本院确诊为瘘管根尖周炎并且做根管治疗的患牙240颗,随机分为A、B、C三组,各80颗。A组填充碘仿氢氧化钙糊剂;B组填充甘油-氢氧化钙糊剂;C组填充麝香草酚糊剂。比较三组患者的疼痛发生率、临床疗效等。结果:A、B、C组疼痛发生率分别为8.75%、28.75%、31.25%,治疗总有效率分别为96.25%、80.00%、83.75%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:瘘管根尖周炎根管治疗患者应用碘仿氢氧化钙糊剂,疗效优于甘油-氢氧化钙糊剂和麝香草酚糊剂,能够有效消除炎症,减少炎性渗出,降低疼痛发生率,疗效好,值得临床推广。Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of different pastes in root canal treatment.Method:A total of 240 teeth were diagnosed as fistula periapical periodontitis and underwent root canal treatment in our hospital.They were randomly divided into three groups of A,B,and C with 80 teeth each.Group A was filled with iodoform calcium hydroxide paste.Group B was filled with glycerol-calcium hydroxide paste.Group C was filled with thymol paste.Compared the pain incidence and clinical efficacy of the three groups.Result:The incidence of pain in groups A,B,and C was 8.75%,28.75%,and 31.25%,respectively,and the total effective rates of treatment were 96.25%,80.00%,and 83.75%,respectively,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of iodoform calcium hydroxide paste for root canal treatment of fistula periapical periodontitis is better than glycerol-calcium hydroxide paste and thymol paste,which can effectively eliminate inflammation,reduce inflammatory exudation,and reduce the incidence of pain.The curative effect is good and it is worthy of clinical promotion.

关 键 词：麝香草酚糊剂 甘油-氢氧化钙糊剂 碘仿氢氧化钙糊剂 根管治疗术 

分 类 号：R781.05[医药卫生—口腔医学]