美好且善好的生活:《苏格拉底的申辩》中的反讽修辞释读  

Beautiful and Good Life:an Interpretation of Irony Rhetoric in Apology

作　　者：谭善明[1] TAN Shan-ming(School of Literature,Huaiyin Normal University,Huai'an 223300,China)

机构地区：[1]淮阴师范学院文学院,江苏淮安223300

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期16-25,共10页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(19YJA751036):柏拉图文艺对话中的修辞观念研究;江苏省社科基金项目(18ZWB006):柏拉图对话中的诗、修辞与哲学研究。

摘　　要：哲学探寻真理,修辞学则注重言说技巧和话语效果,二者看起来针锋相对。但是在《苏格拉底的申辩》中,作为哲人的苏格拉底在法庭上却运用了独特的反讽修辞,这是意味深长的。苏格拉底既要迎战极具说服力的控告者们,又要面对法官们的评判,更重要的是他还要借此机会向雅典民众们发表一场触及灵魂的演说。在这一复杂的情境下,苏格拉底不仅要关心自己说什么,还要关心如何言说,以达到激起更多人反省人生的哲学目的,并最终在言辞中展现出一幅美好且善好生活的图景。Philosophy takes truth as its goal,while rhetoric focuses on speech skills and effects,so they seem to be diametrically opposed.However,in Plato's Apology,Socrates,a philosopher,significantly uses a unique rhetoric of irony in court.Socrates has to face the persuasive accusers and the judges'trial.More importantly,he wants to take this opportunity to deliver a speech touching the souls of Athens.In this complex situation,Socrates should not only care about what he wants to say,but also how to say,so as to achieve the philosophical purpose of inspiring more people to reflect on life,and finally show a picture of beautiful and good life.

关 键 词：美好 善好 修辞 哲学 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]