药学英语学术论文模糊限制语的人际意义研究  

Study on Interpersonal Meaning of Hedges in English Pharmaceutical Academic Papers from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory

作　　者：郑思琦 颜宏婧 张舒婷 万玲 ZHENG Siqi;YAN Hongjing;ZHANG Shuting;WAN Ling(School of Foreign Languages,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350007,China)

机构地区：[1]福建医科大学外国语学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《福建师大福清分校学报》2021年第1期69-75,共7页Journal of Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University

基　　金：福建医科大学大学生创新创业训练计划资助项目(S201910392033)。

摘　　要：基于评价理论框架,采用Antconc软件检索和人工核验的方法,定量分析药学英语学术论文中介入型和极差型模糊限制语频率,定性分析作为不同评价资源模糊限制语的人际意义。研究发现,药学英语论文中介入型模糊限制语多于极差型模糊限制语。药学英语学术论文中,写作者运用不同的评价资源增加或者减少自己态度的介入,表达观点、协商态度并实现人际功能。Based the framework of Appraisal Theory and applying Antconc software and manual examination,a quantitative study was carried out to detect the frequency of involvement hedges and grading hedges,and qualitative research was to explore the interpersonal meaning of hedges with different critical sources.Results show that the number of involvement hedges is bigger than that of grading hedges in English pharmaceutical academic papers.In English pharmaceutical academic papers,authors have strengthened or avoided personal attitudes through the application of different critical sources,in an effort to release personal opinions and negotiate attitudes to achieve interpersonal functions.

关 键 词：模糊限制语 评价理论 人际意义 药学英语学术论文 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]