检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘佳琪[1] 张延清[1] 王巍[1] 常玉莹[1] 高新宇[1] 金英兰[1] Pan Jiaqi;Zhang Yanqing;Chang Yuying(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150000,Heilongjiang,China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第二临床医学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150000
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2021年第2期47-48,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:2018年度黑龙江省省属高等学校基本科研业务费科研项目(2018-KYYWF-0501)。
摘 要:目的:了解以团队为基础的教学(Team-Based Learning,TBL)联合以传统授课为基础的教学(Lecture-Based Leaning,LBL)在血液科生产实习中的应用效果。方法:选取临床医学专业留学生随机分为实验组(TBL组,33人)和对照组(LBL组,33人)。总论部分均采用LBL法进行教学,其他分别用相应教学方法教学,比较两组教学效果。结果:两组成绩比较,综合题测试得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组留学生在综合概括表达能力、主动学习扩展知识等方面较对照组留学生有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:TBL教学法在留学生血液科生产实习中应用效果良好,但具体实施仍需进一步完善。Objective:To verify the application effect of Team-based Learning(TBL)combined with Lecture-based Learning(LBL)in the course of hematology production practice and supply some advices on how to enhance international students teaching level and the students’interest and ability in learning.Methods:International students were picked up in clinical medicine specialty.TBL method was applied in trial group and LBL method used in control group.Then the teaching results were compared.Results:The difference of scores between the two groups was significant in comprehensive test(P<0.05).Conclusion:TBL method has better application effect in international students teaching of hematology production practice but needs further discussion on the practical usage.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3