检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王辉[1] 刘荣[1] 赫娟[1] 巴图尔·吐尔地[1] 于台飞[2] 艾合买提·托胡提 Wang Hui;Liu Rong;He Juan;Batuer Tuerdi;Yu Taifei;Aihemaiti Tuohuti(Department of Radiology,People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830000,China;Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute,Jinan 250000,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院放射科,乌鲁木齐830000 [2]山东省医学影像学研究所,济南250000
出 处:《国际肿瘤学杂志》2020年第12期712-715,共4页Journal of International Oncology
摘 要:目的探讨磁敏感加权成像(SWI)在颅内转移瘤中的鉴别诊断价值。方法收集2018年1月至2020年4月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院住院患者中原发肿瘤为肺癌、乳腺癌、肾癌、直肠癌、膀胱癌、黑色素瘤的颅内转移瘤及胶质母细胞瘤患者63例,半定量评估肿瘤内的敏感性信号强度(ITSS)分级。比较颅内转移瘤与胶质母细胞瘤ITSS分级。结果81个颅内转移瘤中,0级为36个(44.4%),Ⅰ级为25个(30.9%),Ⅱ级为14个(17.3%),Ⅲ级为6个(7.4%);27个胶质母细胞瘤均为Ⅱ~Ⅲ级(100%)。肺癌转移瘤0~Ⅰ级占73.6%(28/38),乳腺癌转移瘤0级占84.6%(22/26),肾癌转移瘤Ⅱ级占5/6,直肠癌转移瘤0~Ⅰ级占4/5,胶质母细胞瘤Ⅲ级占77.8%(21/27)。颅内转移瘤与胶质母细胞瘤ITSS分级组间差异有统计学意义(Z=7.013,P<0.001)。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,ITSS≤Ⅰ级判断颅内转移瘤的敏感性为100%,特异性为75.3%,曲线下面积为0.936(95%CI为0.891~0.980,P<0.001)。结论颅内转移瘤ITSS分级多表现为0~Ⅰ级,胶质母细胞瘤多表现为Ⅱ~Ⅲ级。SWI在颅内转移瘤中有一定的鉴别诊断价值。Objective To explore the value of susceptibility weighted imaging(SWI)in differential diagnosis of intracranial metastatic tumors.Methods Sixty-three patients with intracranial metastatic tumors(primary tumors of lung cancer,breast cancer,kidney cancer,rectal cancer,bladder cancer and melanoma)and glioblastomas in People′s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2018 to April 2020 were collected,and the intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity(ITSS)was evaluated semi-quantitatively.The grading characteristics of ITSS of metastatic tumors and glioblastomas were compared.Results Among the 81 intracranial metastatic tumors,36(44.4%)were grade 0,25(30.9%)were gradeⅠ,14(17.3%)were gradeⅡand 6(7.4%)were gradeⅢ.Among the 27 glioblastomas,27(100%)were gradeⅡ-Ⅲ.Grade 0-Ⅰmetastatic tumors of lung cancer accounted for 73.6%(28/38).Grade 0 metastatic tumors of breast cancer accounted for 84.6%(22/26).GradeⅡmetastatic tumor of kidney cancer accounted for 5/6.Grade 0-Ⅰmetastatic tumors of rectal cancer accounted for 4/5.GradeⅢglioblastomas accounted for 77.8%(21/27).The difference of ITSS classification between intracranial metastatic tumors and glioblastomas was statistically significant(Z=7.013,P<0.001).According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis,the sensitivity and specificity of ITSS≤gradeⅠwere 100%and 75.3%respectively,and the area under the curve was 0.936(95%CI:0.891-0.980,P<0.001).Conclusion The patients with intracranial metastatic tumor usually present ITSS grade 0-Ⅰ,and the patients with glioblastoma usually present ITSS gradeⅡ-Ⅲ.SWI has a certain value for differential diagnosis of intracranial metastatic tumors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222