检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕云震 高益民[2] LYUYunzhen;GAO Yimin(Institute of Defense and Management,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081;Institute of International and Comparative Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学国防经济与管理研究院,北京100081 [2]北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院,北京100875
出 处:《比较教育研究》2021年第2期73-81,共9页International and Comparative Education
摘 要:在教育全球化时代,地方化因素对于一个国家是否成为教育改革的参考标准依然重要。澳大利亚和韩国两国媒体对亚洲国家和地区PISA成功的描述与话语讨论因国情不同而表现出各自的特点,进而影响着政策借鉴是否可以以及如何发生。基于对澳大利亚与韩国媒体对PISA结果报道的比较后发现,对亚洲教育的刻板印象、国家间的经济关系、潜在参考国家和地区在PISA排名表中相对排名的变化等三大因素影响着一个国家对这些国家或地区"最优教育系统"的政策借鉴。In the era of educational globalization,local factors are still important for determining whether a country could become the reference standard for education reform.Australian and South Korean media’s descriptions and discourse discussions on the success of PISA in Asian countries have their own characteristics due to different national conditions,which in turn affects whether and how policy references occur.Based on a comparison of PISA results reported by Australian and Korean media,it is found that the stereotypes of Asian education in globalization,the economic relations between countries,and the sense of crisis caused by changes in the relative ranking of countries in the PISA ranking table,these three major factors affect the policy transfer from the "optimal education system".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170