“在”与“着”之别及其功能投射  

The Contrast between Mandarin "Zai" and "Zhe" as well as Their Functional Projections

作　　者：段张涛 DUAN Zhangtao

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学语言学系,北京100080

出　　处：《淮南师范学院学报》2020年第6期117-122,共6页Journal of Huainan Normal University

摘　　要：传统汉语语法将表时间的“在”分析为介词或副词,“在”可以作为功能范畴。“在”“着”之间的不同在句法推导上也有所体现。“在”分析为时体范畴的子类Prog(Progressive),“着”也是时体范畴的子类Dura(Durative)。在句法上,后缀“着”具有黏附性,吸引动词向“着”移位,“在”前附动词,处于核心移位限制(HMC)的要求,动词禁止向“在”移位。In traditional Chinese grammar,"Zai"which indicates time is analyzed as a preposition or adverb.In this article,"Zai"is a functional category and the contrast between"Zai"and"Zhe"will be discussed.In particular,"Zai"is the phonetic realization of functional category Prog(Progressive),the subclass of Asp(Aspect),and"Zhe"is Dura(Durative),the subclass of Aspect as well.In syntactic derivation,the suffix"Zhe"is bounded,and therefore attracts the verb to merge with"Zhe".While"Zai"attaches before the verb,it prohibits the verb to move to"Zai"as required by Head Movement Constraint(HMC).

关 键 词：“在” “着” 时体范畴 Prog DURA 

分 类 号：H03[语言文字—语言学]