检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾萍阳 Jia Pingyang
机构地区:[1]新疆水利水电勘测设计研究院,新疆乌鲁木齐830000
出 处:《吉林水利》2021年第3期13-17,共5页Jilin Water Resources
摘 要:为了对比研究不同整流措施对弯道流态的改善效果,本文通过数值模拟方法建立了无措施、布置导流墙、丁坝、斜底槛四种模型,通过模拟结果可以发现布置导流墙后,可以减小弯道水流惯性力,流态得到一定改善。布置丁坝后流态较导流墙效果不明显,但主流区被导向凸岸,对凸岸具有一定防冲刷作用。布置斜底槛后,下游的左右岸水力要素分布均匀,而且旋涡较多,具有导流与消能的双重作用。In order to compare the effect of different rectifying measures on the improvement of flow pattern in the bend,this paper established four models by numerical simulation method,including no measures,layout of diversion wall,spur dike and inclined sill.Through the simulation results,it can be found that after the layout of diversion wall,the flow inertia force in the bend can be reduced,and the flow pattern can be improved to a certain extent.Although the main flow area is directed to the convex bank,which has a certain anti-scouring effect,the improvement was less obvious than the diversion wall.After the inclined sill is arranged,the hydraulic elements on the left and right banks of the downstream are evenly distributed,with more vortices,which have the dual functions of diversion and energy dissipation.
分 类 号:TV651.1[水利工程—水利水电工程] TV135.2
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222