刑事涉案财物处置的监察调查制度构建与完善  

Construction and improvement of the supervision and investigationsystem for the disposal of criminal property

作　　者：郭沙沙 郝世坤[2] Guo Shasha;Hao Shikun(Shenzhen University,Shenzhen Guangdong 518060,China;Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology,Qinhuangdao Hebei 066000,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学,广东深圳518060 [2]河北科技师范学院,河北秦皇岛066000

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2021年第1期68-74,共7页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：我国《监察法》非常重视涉案财物调查程序之正当性,针对搜查、扣押等调查工作确立了强制录音录像制度。但是,目前刑事涉案财物调查体系制度定位仍存在偏差,如未能体现其财产保全价值;监察机关能否对刑事涉案财物进行实体处分,立法方面语焉不详;利害关系人之权利保障机制尚不健全。应当以人财并重理念及程序正义原则为指导,强调对物调查之财产保全价值;检察机关应成为财产保全及实体处分的决定主体,加强检察权对监察权的制衡与监督;细化和完善利害关系人之程序性权利,构建以检察机关为主体的程序救济机制。China’s“Supervision Law”attaches great importance to the legitimacy of the investigation procedures of the property involved in the case,and has established a mandatory audio and video recording system for investigations such as search and seizure.However,the current system positioning of the criminal property investigation system still has deviations,such as failing to reflect the value of its property preservation;whether the supervisory agency can physically sanction the criminal property involved is unclear in legislation;the rights protection mechanism of the interested parties is not yet complete.It should be guided by the concept of equal emphasis on human and financial resources and the principle of procedural justice,emphasizing the value of property preservation in the investigation of objects;procuratorial organs should become the main body of decision on property preservation and physical sanctions,and strengthen the checks and balances and supervision of procuratorial power over supervision power;refine and improve the procedural rights of interested parties to construct a procedural relief mechanism with procuratorial organs as the main body.

关 键 词：刑事涉案财物 监察调查 程序正当性 实体处分 权利救济机制 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]