叙事的漏洞与弥补——再思利奥塔的叙事理论  

The Weakness and Compensation of Narration:Rethinking Lyotard's Theory of narration

作　　者：李永旭 LI Yongxu(Department of Philosophy,AnHui University,Hefei,Anhui 230039)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学哲学系,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《绵阳师范学院学报》2021年第3期30-35,48,共7页Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College

摘　　要：利奥塔在《后现代状态》中借两种知识的区分提出了反对宏大叙事、支持微型叙事的主张。而阿伦特在《论革命》中对法国革命失败的分析则反映出微型叙事本身也有不可靠之处,必须要有先验的理性观念在叙事中起作用,同时也宣告了叙事的二元对立的失败。胡塞尔的内时间意识现象学为通过习性解释理性观念的先验作用提供了手段,而交互主体性现象学提出的单子自我的交织和由诸单子自我构造出的作为意义活动场域的世界。则进一步为弥合这种二元对立提供出一个方案,但此方案尚有不完善之处。In The Postmodern Condition,Lyotta putts forward the proposition of opposing grand narration and supporting miniature narration by distinguishing two kinds of knowledge.Arendt's analysis of the failure of the French revolution in On Revolution shows that miniature narration itself is not reliable,and a transcendental rational concept must play a role in it,which also declares the failure of the binary opposition of narration.Husserl's phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time provides the means of explaining the transcendental function of rational ideas through habituality.And phenomenology of inter-subjectivity proposed the intermeshing of monad egos and the world which constituted by them as the field of senses activity,which make further efforts to provide a scheme to overcome this dualism opposition,but this scheme still had some imperfections.

关 键 词：叙事 微型叙事 革命叙事 内时间意识 交互主体性 单子自我 

分 类 号：B565.5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]