检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭小冬[1] Guo Xiaodong
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2021年第2期145-156,共12页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社科基金项目(19BFX082)“请求权视角下民事诉讼法与民法典问题对接研究”。
摘 要:《民法典》第997条规定了人格权禁令制度,但并未同时规定人格权禁令申请的审查条件和审理程序,也未明确该制度的实体法或程序法以及诉讼或非讼的属性。有观点认为人格权禁令制度就是人格权侵权领域的诉前行为保全。但是,人格权禁令与行为保全是两种不同的制度。人格权禁令制度的规定,改变了我国“侵权诉讼+行为保全+民事责任”的权利保护结构。为了确保实体法立法目的顺利实现,《民事诉讼法》应尽快作出调整以便实现与《民法典》规定的对接与协调。The injunction of personality right is a new rule in the Civil Code.But there is not the special hearing procedure and the examination conditions in the same Code.Nor has it clarified the substantive law or procedural law of the system and the nature of litigation or non-litigation.Some people think that the injunction of personality right is the pre-lawsuit behavior preservation.However,I think they are two different systems.With the injunction of personality right,the right protection structure of“tort action+preservation+civil liability”has been changed in China.In order to come true the legislative purpose of substantive law and the harmonization and unification of the two laws,the Civil Procedure Law should be adjusted as soon as possible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3