基于五运六气理论分析主要伤寒学派医家学术思想  

Analysis on the academic thoughts of the doctors of the major typhoid school based on the five movements and six qi theory

作　　者：杨必安[1] 高楠楠 曹丽娟 黄作阵 YANG Bi-an;GAO Nan-nan;CAO Li-juan;HUANG Zuo-zhen(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,China;Tsinghua University Hospital,Beijing 100091,China;Huguosi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100035,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100029 [2]清华大学医院,北京100091 [3]护国寺中医医院,北京100035 [4]北京中医药大学国学院医古文教研室,北京100029

出　　处：《中华中医药杂志》2020年第12期6369-6371,共3页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy

基　　金：北京市中医药科技发展资金项目(No.JJ2018-78)。

摘　　要：张仲景创立六经辨证体系以来,历代研究伤寒学说的医家甚多,但是由于张仲景的《伤寒杂病论》医理深奥,故历代医家对其诠解不一,差异非常大。文章从五运六气的角度分析5位代表医家张仲景、韩祗和、庞安时、朱肱、许叔微治伤寒之学的学术特色以及学术形成原因,从而揭示了伤寒学派各医家诠释仲景学说不一的重要影响因素。Since ZHANG Zhong-jing founded the six meridians syndrome differentiation system, there have been many doctors who studied the theory of typhoid fever in the past dynasties. However, due to the profound medical theory of ZHANG Zhong-jing’s Shanghan Zabing Lun, physicians of different dynasties have different interpretations. This paper analyzes the academic characteristics and academic reasons of the five representative physicians, including ZHANG Zhong-jing, HAN Zhi-he, PANG An-shi, ZHU Gong and XU Shu-wei, in the study of treating typhoid fever from the perspective of five movements and six qi, thus revealing the important influencing factors of the different interpretations of Zhongjing theory by various physicians of typhoid school.

关 键 词：五运六气 伤寒学派 医家思想 

分 类 号：R226[医药卫生—中医基础理论]