辽宁省的碳赤字解决模式与生态环境效益研究  

A study on solution mode of carbon deficit and eco-environmental benefit in Liaoning Province

作　　者：胡剑锋 杨宜男 路世昌[3] HU Jianfeng;YANG Yinan;LU Shichang(College of Culture and Law,Fuqing Branch of Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou Fujian 350300;College of Geography and Tourism,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241000;College of Business Administration,Liaoning Technical University,Huludao Liaoning 125000)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学福清分校文法学院,福建福州350300 [2]安徽师范大学地理与旅游学院,安徽芜湖241000 [3]辽宁工程技术大学工商管理学院,辽宁葫芦岛125000

出　　处：《环境污染与防治》2021年第3期383-387,共5页Environmental Pollution & Control

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学规划基金一般项目(No.L17DJL003)。

摘　　要：为解决辽宁省的碳赤字问题,比较了通过碳排放权交易(模式1)和通过营造碳汇林(模式2)两种模式的生态环境效益。结果发现:(1)2004、2005年辽宁省存在一定的碳盈余,但从2006年开始出现了碳赤字,而且碳赤字有逐渐增大的趋势,直到2012年才稳定下来;(2)虽然模式2的生态环境成本大于模式1,但营造的碳汇林具有巨大的生态系统服务功能价值,能够使辽宁省的生态环境效益扭亏为盈。因此,如果仅从生态环境成本的角度考虑,模式1比模式2更为经济,但模式1下的CO_(2)过度排放对生态环境产生的破坏和压力却难以估量,而模式2下碳汇林提供的生态系统服务功能价值是巨大的。综合而言,模式2是一种更为可持续的解决碳赤字问题的方案,建议辽宁省选择模式2解决碳赤字问题。In order to solve carbon deficit in Liaoning Province,eco-environmental benefits of 2 modes(Mode 1 was to purchase carbon emission permit,and Mode 2 was to plant carbon sink forest)were compared.Results showed that:(1)there existed carbon profit in Liaoning Province in 2004 and 2005,but there appeared carbon deficit after 2006.The carbon deficit expanded until 2012.(2)Although eco-environmental cost of Mode 2 was higher than that of Mode 1,however Mode 2 generated huge ecosystem service value,making eco-environmental benefit from minus to plus.Therefore,only considering eco-environmental cost,Mode 1 was more economic than Mode 2.However,Mode 1 had inestimable damage and pressure because of excessive CO_(2)emission,but Mode 2 had huge ecosystem service value.In total,Mode 2 was a more sustainable strategy to solve carbon deficit,so it was suggested to choose Mode 2 as the strategy to solve the problem of carbon deficit in Liaoning Province.

关 键 词：辽宁省 碳赤字 生态环境成本 生态系统服务功能价值 生态环境效益 

分 类 号：X171.1[环境科学与工程—环境科学]