社会体育学能成为一门独立学科吗  

Can Social Sport be called an Independent Discipline

作　　者：彭红[1] 徐佶 吕树庭[1] PENG Hong;XU Ji;LYU Shuting(Guangzhou Sport University,Guangzhou 510500,China;Guangdong Sport Vocational and Technical College,Gruangzhou 510663,China)

机构地区：[1]广州体育学院,广州510500 [2]广东体育职业技术学院,广州510663

出　　处：《体育与科学》2021年第2期47-51,共5页Sports & Science

摘　　要：长期以来,社会体育是一个领域,一个研究范畴,还是一门学科;社会体育学能否成为一门独立学科,存在许多隐性的争议。本文运用文献法,通过对社会体育的由来与发展的论述指出,社会体育作为一个社会事实,作为一门课程,作为一个专业的历史功绩必须肯定,但它不是一门学科,而是一种社会事实,是体育科学众多学科都可以涉及的公共研究范畴。社会体育学产生的外部条件不是唯一的(特殊需要),不具备排它性。从学科的内部逻辑结构来看,社会体育学不但没有独特的研究对象、理论框架和特有的学科视角,也缺乏独特的研究方法的支持。所以,目前的社会体育学尚不能被称为一门独立学科。For a long time,there are many hidden disputes about whether social sport is a field,a research category,a discipline,or can become an independent discipline.By using the method of literature,this paper discusses the origin and development of social sport,and points out that its achievements must be affirmed as a social fact,a course,and a professional historical.Social sport is a social fact but not a discipline,which can be involved in many sports disciplines.It is proved that the external conditions for the emergence of social sport science are not unique(special needs)and has not exclusiveness.From the internal logical structure of the discipline,social sports science not only has no unique research object,theoretical framework and unique discipline perspective,but also lacks the support of unique research methods.Therefore,social sport science can’t be called an independent discipline at present.

关 键 词：社会体育 社会体育学 独立学科 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]