困境与对策:恢复性司法于环境犯罪中的适用  

Dilemma and Countermeasures:Application of Restorative Justice in Environmental Crimes

作　　者：李国歆 邓建华 Li Guoxin;Deng Jianhua(Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou Gansu 730070,China)

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法大学,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《河北环境工程学院学报》2021年第2期55-61,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Environmental Engineering

基　　金：甘肃政法大学研究生科研创新项目(2019038)。

摘　　要：伴随《刑法修正案(八)》对生态环境犯罪法益的立法转向,有条件地承认了环境资源即是刑法所值得保护的利益。生态环境犯罪法益理论侧重法益恢复与轻缓刑罚的思想与恢复性司法的利益平衡、犯罪人再社会化具有目标一致性,因而相互契合。恢复性司法应用于生态环境犯罪的探索正在司法实践中广泛开展,然而实践中仍然存在适用方式法律依据不足、适用范围存有局限、司法裁量标准缺位以及配套制度残缺等突出问题和现实困境。应当通过完善立法、健全裁量标准、完善配套制度的对策予以应对。With the legislative change of the Criminal Law Amendment(VIII)to the legal interests of ecological environmental crimes,it is necessary to recognize environmental resources as the interests worthy of protection in criminal law.The idea of restoring legal interests and mitigating punishment,which is emphasized by the theory of legal interests of ecological environment crimes,has the same goal as the balance of interests of restorative justice and the resocialization of criminals,so it fits each other.The application of restorative justice to ecological environment crimes is being widely carried out in judicial practice.However,in practice,there are still some outstanding problems and practical difficulties,such as insufficient legal basis for application methods,limited scope of application,lack of judicial discretion standards and incomplete supporting systems.We should take countermeasures to improve legislation,discretion standard and supporting system.

关 键 词：恢复性司法 环境犯罪 犯罪法益 限定环境本位思想 非刑罚措施 裁量标准 生态环境损害司法鉴定 

分 类 号：D922.[政治法律—法学]