涡轮手机拔牙法与传统劈凿拔牙法拔除下颌中位Ⅰ类近中阻生智齿术后肿胀的比较  

Comparison of postoperative swelling after applying the turbine handpieces and the traditional chisel of bone splitting method to extract the class A median mesially impacted wisdom tooth

作　　者：林珊 戴丽冰 翁春辉 赵向阳 王晓燕 郭爱芳 LIN Shan;DAI Libing;WENG Chunhui;ZHAO Xiangyang;WANG Xiaoyan;GUO Aifang(Department of Stomatology Yanling Hospital,Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510507)

机构地区：[1]广东燕岭医院口腔科,广州510507 [2]广州市红十字会医院,暨南大学医学院附属广州红十字会医院,广州市创伤外科研究所 [3]广州市红十字会医院,暨南大学医学院附属广州红十字会医院,广州市口腔科研究所

出　　处：《现代口腔医学杂志》2021年第1期40-41,共2页Journal of Modern Stomatology

基　　金：广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2017501);广东省中医药局面上项目(20171207);广州市中医药和中西医结合科技项目(20182A010012)。

摘　　要：目的对涡轮手机拔牙法与传统劈凿拔牙法在拔除下颌中位Ⅰ类近中阻生智齿术后的肿胀度进行比较。方法将40例下颌中位Ⅰ类近中阻生智齿随机分为涡轮手机拔牙组及传统劈凿拔牙组,每组20例。对2组术后肿胀度进行比较,并采用SPSS21.0软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果涡轮手机拔牙组和传统劈凿拔牙组术后肿胀度分别为(18±6)和(20±4),存在显著差异(P<0.05)。结论对于下颌中位Ⅰ类近中阻生智齿拔除术而言,传统劈凿法较涡轮手机拔牙法术后肿胀度更小。Objective To compare the postoperative swelling after extracting the class A median mesially impacted wisdom tooth by the turbine handpieces and the traditional chisel of bone splitting method.Methods Forty cases of class A median mesially impacted wisdom tooth were randomly divided into two groups,and they were extracted using the turbine handpieces(n=20)and the traditional chisel of bone splitting method(n=20),respectively.Postoperative swelling degree of both groups was compared and analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software.Results A significant difference in the postoperative swelling degree was detected between turbine handpieces group(18±6)and traditional chisel of bone splitting group(20±4)(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional chisel of bone splitting method,turbine handpieces method resulted in a milder postoperative swelling after extracting the class A median mesially impacted wisdom tooth.

关 键 词：下颌中位Ⅰ类近中阻生智齿 涡轮手机拔牙 传统劈凿拔牙 

分 类 号：R782.1[医药卫生—口腔医学]