出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2021年第3期226-231,共6页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:国家科技重大专项(2017YFC1310400)。
摘 要:目的根据成瘾行为的发展过程对甲基苯丙胺使用者进行阶段划分,探讨不同阶段使用者的特点,为制订有针对性的临床干预措施提供理论参考。方法以某强制隔离戒毒所2018年9月至2019年12月收治的男性甲基苯丙胺使用者作为研究对象,在其入所1周内完成临床诊断、访谈及问卷评估,研究对象按成瘾行为的阶段特征进行区分。使用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Barrett冲动量表(Barrett impulsiveness scale,BIS)、CogState量表对所有被试进行评估。使用SPSS 20.0进行统计分析,组间比较采用方差分析或秩和检验,采用多因素Logistic回归分析探究与成瘾行为发展相关的因素。结果(1)强迫性用药组在累计使用时长[24(8,48)月,12(4,24)月,22(10,36)月]、用药剂量[(6.6±3.8)片,(2.8±1.4)片,(4.5±3.4)片]、渴求感评分[1.0(0,5.0)分,0(0,1.0)分,1.0(0,3.0)分]都高于其它两组(P<0.05),且有更多既往使用海洛因的经历[20.4%,9.8%,14.8%,P<0.05];规律性用药组则较其它两组有更多的戒毒次数[1(1,3)次,1(0,1)次,1(1,2)次,P<0.05]。强迫性用药组Barrett冲动量表总评分[(42.8±13.3)分,(34.5±13.6)分,(36.1±14.9)分]及各维度的评分[行动冲动:(37.5±15.8)分,(27.8±13.4)分,(29.2±17.8)分;认知冲动:(43.2±18.0)分,(39.4±17.0)分,(37.2±18.1)分;非计划冲动:(47.2±19.8)分,(38.8±18.7)分,(40.7±20.8)分]都要显著高于其它两组(P<0.05);而在认知评估中强迫性用药组ISL和SEC两个模块的评分均显著低于其它两组[(16.50±4.87)分,(19.30±4.78)分,(18.33±4.91)分;(0.76±0.21)分,(0.89±0.22)分,(0.81±0.21)分;P<0.05]。(2)多因素Logistic回归分析显示甲基苯丙胺累计使用时长(β=0.022,OR=1.022,95%CI:1.003~1.042)、用药剂量(β=0.625,OR=1.869,95%CI:1.196~2.921)、渴求感(β=0.194,OR=1.214,95%CI:1.002~1.215)、Barrett总分(β=0.036,OR=1.037,95%CI:1.013~1.061)、非计划冲动评分(β=0.040,OR=1.041,95%CI:1.004~1.038)、行动冲动(β=0.033,OR=1.214,95%CObjective To differentiate the methamphetamine users according to the developmental stages of addictive behavior,and explore the characteristics of different stages in order to provid a theoretical reference for our clinical intervention.Methods Take the male methamphetamine users in compulsory detoxification institute whom were admitted from September 2018 to December 2019 as research objects.All the objects were asked to complete clinical diagnosis,interview and questionnaire evaluation in one week.According to the developmental stages of addictive behavior,the subjects were divided into occasional use group(n=51),regular use group(n=95)and compulsive use group(n=157).All subjects were evaluated using visual analogue scale(VAS),Barrett impulsiveness scale(BIS)and CogState scale.SPSS 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis,AVOVA or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for group comparison.Multiple Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors associated with the development of addictive behavior.Results(1)The compulsive use group had higher cumulative duration(24(8,48),12(4,24),22(10,36)),average dose(6.6±3.8,2.8±1.4,4.5±3.4)and craving score(1(0,5),0(0,1),1(0,3))than the other two groups(all P<0.05).And individuals in compulsive use group had more previous heroin use experience(20.4%,9.8%,14.8%,P<0.05).The regular use group had more withdrawal times than the other two groups(1(1,3),1(0,1),1(1,2),P<0.05).The total scores of Barrett impulsiveness scale(42.8±13.3,34.5±13.6,36.1±14.9)and the scores in all dimensions in the compulsive use group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups(motor impulsiveness:37.5±15.8,27.8±13.4,29.2±17.8;attentional impulsiveness:43.2±18.0,39.4±17.0,37.2±18.1;non-planning impulsiveness:47.2±19.8,38.8±18.7,40.7±20.8;P<0.05).In the compulsive use users,the ISL(16.50±4.87,19.30±4.78,18.33±4.91)and SEC(0.76±0.21,0.89±0.22,0.81±0.21)scores about cognitive assessment were significantly lower than other two groups(both P<0.05).(2)The re
分 类 号:R749.64[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...