检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚中秋 YAO Zhong-qiu(School of International Studies,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《江苏行政学院学报》2021年第2期74-82,共9页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
摘 要:;历史学早已揭明秦汉之际郡县制国家治理者由文法吏转变为士大夫的事实,从政治学和公共行政学角度研究这两类政治主体的品质与行动逻辑,发现秦汉之际的文法吏是典型的韦伯式官僚,士大夫则融官僚、政治家,教化者角色于一体,是“领导性治理者”,其行动逻辑完全不同于官僚;当代中国的“干部”与士大夫群体有构成上的传承性,又有更强的组织性、纪律性。因此,以官僚制理论研究中国传统和当代政治是不恰当的,中国政治学和行政学应建立深入研究士大夫—干部的学术分支。Historic science has shown evidence that as state governors, Scholar-bureaucrats(Shi da fu)replaced Law-enforcer(Wen fa li)in the middle Western-Han Dynasty. This article explores qualities and action logic of these two types of political agent from the perspective of politics and public administration, and the most important finding are that Law-enforcer is a typical Weberian bureaucrat;however, the scholar-bureaucrats integrate the roles of bureaucrat, politician, and cultivator. As "leading-governors", their action logic is completely different from that of bureaucrats;correspondingly, contemporary Chinese "cadres" have the same attributes with Scholar-bureaucrat, despite the fact that they are more organized and disciplined. It is not appropriate therefore to study Chinese ancient and contemporary politics and administration with the theory of bureaucracy. Instead, Chinese scholars have responsibilities and conditions to establish a specific academic branch that can make in-depth studies on scholar-bureaucrats and cadres.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.210.23