漫漫忏悔路——《赎罪》的文学伦理学解读  

A Long Journey of Redemption:A Reading of Atonement from the Perspective of Literary Ethical Criticism

作　　者：刘洋[1] 高飞[2] Liu Yang;Gao Fei

机构地区：[1]合肥工业大学 [2]安徽农业大学

出　　处：《外国语文研究（辑刊）》2018年第1期129-138,共10页

基　　金：合肥工业大学哲学社会科学培育计划项目“麦克尤恩小说的空间伦理研究”(JS2017HGXJ0022)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：麦克尤恩的小说《赎罪》一直以来都是研究者关注的焦点,本文运用文学伦理学批评方法,从小说的故事层面和叙事层面对其进行文学伦理学解读。在故事层面上,《赎罪》以主人公布里奥妮的犯罪—赎罪为线索,将其置于战争的宏大背景之下,写出了战争中人性的善与恶,而在叙事层面上,作为一部带有元小说色彩的后现代作品,它体现了作者对于作家责任的思考。本文首先通过还原伦理现场,梳理伦理线,解构伦理结,对于布里奥妮的犯错与赎罪的伦理选择进行分析;其次,结合文本,对于导致不同伦理选择的斯芬克斯因子予以探讨,从而让我们对于人性——这个麦克尤恩一直关注的主题——有新的理解。最后,通过作家面临的双重困境,对于作家的写作责任进行了探讨。Ian McEwan's Atonemet has always been a major concern for scholars.Focusing on the storyline and the narrative of Atonement,this paper attempts to offer an interpretation of Atonement from the perspective of literary ethical criticism.From the aspect of the storyline of Atonement,with Briony's journey of erring and redeeming as a central thread,McEwan portrays good and evil in human nature in wartime.As for the narrative of Atonement,as a postmodern metafiction,it reflects the author's thought on writer's responsibility.Firstly,this paper analyzes Briony's ethical choices of erring and redeeming by tracing back to ethical environment,teasing out ethical lines,and deconstructing ethical knots;Secondly,with reference to relevant text,this paper discusses Sphinx factor leading to different ethical choices so as to gain a new insight into human nature,a theme that fascinates McEwan;Thirdly,through the narration of writing and publishing dilemma,this paper probes into the writer's responsibility.

关 键 词：《赎罪》 麦克尤恩 伦理选择 斯芬克斯因子 责任 

分 类 号：I561.074[文学—其他各国文学]