检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳希凝 YUE Xining(School of Law, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
出 处:《沈阳大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第2期133-138,共6页Journal of Shenyang University:Social Science
摘 要:通过对12件与电子眼取证相关的交通行政处罚案例进行分析,对电子眼取证的可采性争点进行了归纳,系统梳理了法院作出的回应和进行裁判的依据,提出可以通过融贯法律依据,将当事人的诉求进行分类处理,以及借鉴既有判例帮助判断电子眼取证在交通行政处罚中的可采性。Through the analysis of 12 practical cases of traffic administrative punishment related to electronic eyes,this paper summarizes the disputes on the admissibility of electronic eyes for evidence collection,and systematically sorts out the court's response methods and the basis for judgments.It puts forward that it can be used to categorize the claims of the parties through the integration of legal basis,and to learn from existing precedents to help judge the admissibility of electronic eye evidence in traffic administrative punishment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.102.227