检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:甘欣悦 边兰春[2] GAN Xinyue;BIAN Lanchun
机构地区:[1]深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院,广东深圳510030 [2]清华大学建筑学院,北京100084
出 处:《城市发展研究》2021年第3期133-140,共8页Urban Development Studies
摘 要:基于非正规性研究领域,引入新制度主义解释框架,回答国家作为行动者是如何影响非正规住房形成的。以北京老城传统居住地区——平房四合院内非正规住房的形成与发展为对象,通过住房数据分析、访谈与参与观察对该框架进行实证检验。结果表明:为了实现特定历史时期集体利益的最大化,国家进行了土地和住房产权改革,在此过程中附带产生了非正规住房。在国家的默许和单位制影响住房供给的路径依赖的双重作用下,非正规住房规模不断扩大。结论为我国城市传统居住地区非正规住房的形成贡献了新的理论解释,未来希望检验该框架在解释城中村非正规住房形成中的适用性。Based on the study field of informality,this paper constructs the explanatory framework of neo-institutionalism to answer the research question——how the state act impact on the formation of informal housing?Taking the urban traditional residential area in Beijing old city as the study object,through housing data analysis,interview and participatory observation,the paper indicates that:to complete the maximum of collective interest in specific historical period,the state proceeded the reform of land and housing property rights.In this process,informal housing formed incidentally.On the effect of acquiescence of the state as well as path dependency of housing supply which was influenced by the unit system,the scale of informal housing expanded constantly.The conclusion has provided the new theoretical explanation of the formation of informal housing in Chinese urban traditional residential area.The future research will discuss the applicability of explanatory framework in urban village.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.190.205