检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王昱蕴 Wang Yuyun(Criminal Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2021年第1期52-57,共6页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:不得强迫自证其罪原则起源于欧美大陆并经历了漫长的发展,现已在世界范围内逐渐确立为一项通用的刑事诉讼原则。直至2012年,我国刑事诉讼法也正式将不得强迫自证其罪的规定加入相关条文,并区别于沉默权和如实供述义务。结合认罪认罚从宽制度,我国对不得强迫自证其罪原则已有一系列“本土化”进程。进一步规定刑事诉讼非法证据排除规则,明确违反不得强迫自证其罪原则的法律制裁,将有助于谋划和完善该原则在我国的未来和出路。The principle of not forcing self-incrimination originated in Europe and the United States and has experienced a long development.It has been gradually established as a general criminal procedure principle in the world.China's criminal Procedure Law formally added the stipulation of not forcing self-incrimination into relevant provisions until 2012,which is different from the right to silence and the obligation of truthful confession.Combined with the lenient punishment system of confession,the principle of not forcing self-incrimination has also carried out a series of“localization”processes in China.By further stipulating the exclusion rules of illegal evidence in criminal proceedings and clarifying the legal sanctions for violating the principle of not forcing selfincrimination,the future and way out of this principle in China will be improved.
关 键 词:不得强迫自证其罪原则 沉默权 如实供述义务 认罪认罚从宽制度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.192.254