检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田雪妍 殷晓鸣[1] 张斌[2] TIAN Xueyan;YIN Xiaoming;ZHANG Bin(Department of Urological Surgical,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China;Department of Medical imaging,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Shenyang 110004,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院泌尿外科,辽宁沈阳110004 [2]中国医科大学附属盛京医院影像科,辽宁沈阳110004
出 处:《分子影像学杂志》2021年第2期341-345,共5页Journal of Molecular Imaging
摘 要:目的探讨MRI动态增强扫描(DCE-MRI)、扩散张量成像(DTI)及两者联合在前列腺中央区结节鉴别诊断中的价值。方法选取2019年1月~2020年6月在我院就诊的前列腺中央区结节患者79例,共计91个结节,给予DCE-MRI、DTI检查,分析良恶性结节DCE-MRI、DTI参数差异。结果经病理学诊断,91个结节中,恶性结节39个,良性结节52个;恶性结节DCE-MRI参数峰值时间为103.36±32.50 s,明显低于良性结节(P<0.05),而强化率和容量转移常数分别为(4.90±1.10)%和12.20±4.11 min^(-1),明显高于良性结节(P<0.05);恶性结节时间-强度曲线(TIC)类型Ⅲ比例为84.62%,明显多于良性结节(P<0.05);良性结节TIC类型Ⅱ比例为80.77%,明显多于恶性结节(P<0.05);良恶性结节TIC类型Ⅰ比例比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);恶性结节DTI参数表观扩散系数值为(1.03±0.22)×10^(-3) mm^(2)/s,明显低于良性结节(P<0.05),而各向异性分数为0.32±0.10,明显高于良性结节(P<0.05);峰值时间、强化率、容量转移常数、TIC类型、表观扩散系数、各向异性分数及联合诊断前列腺中央区恶性结节的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.870、0.883、0.868、0.838、0.903、0.885和0.933(P<0.05)。结论DCE-MRI、DTI及联合诊断在前列腺中央区结节鉴别诊断中有较好的应用价值,值得临床使用。Objective To investigate the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI(DCE-MRI),diffusion tensor imaging(DTI)and their combination in the differential diagnosis of central prostate nodules.Methods From January 2019 to June 2020,79 patients with central prostate nodules in our hospital,91 nodules,were examined by DCE-MRI and DTI,and the differences of parameters between benign and malignant nodules were analyzed.Results The pathological diagnosis was made,among the 91 nodules;39 were malignant and 52 were benign.The Tmax of DCE-MRI parameters of malignant nodules was 103.36±32.50s,which was significantly lower than that of benign nodules(P<0.05),while the enhancement rate and Ktrans were(4.90±1.10)%and 12.20±4.11 min-1,which were significantly higher than those of benign nodules(P<0.05).The proportion of TIC type III in malignant nodules was 84.62%,which was significantly higher than that in benign nodules(P<0.05).The proportion of TIC typeⅡin benign nodules was 80.77%,which was significantly higher than that in malignant nodules(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the proportion of TIC type I between benign and malignant nodules(P>0.05).The ADC value of malignant nodules was(1.03±0.22)×10^(-3) mm^(2)/s,which was significantly lower than that of benign nodules(P<0.05),while the FA was 0.32±0.10,which was significantly higher than that of benign nodules(P<0.05).The area under ROC curve of Tmax,enhancement rate,Ktrans,TIC type,ADC,FA and combined diagnosis of central prostate malignant nodules were 0.870,0.883,0.868,0.838,0.903,0.885 and 0.933,respectively(P<0.05).Conclusion DCE-MRI,DTI and combined diagnosis have good application value in the differential diagnosis of central prostate nodules and is worthy of clinical use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.106