检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李敏[1] 王明帅[2] 张继洋 张小东[2] 蒋涛[1] LI Min;WANG Ming-shuai;Zhang Ji-yang(Department of Radiology,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100020,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院放射科,北京100020 [2]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020
出 处:《放射学实践》2021年第5期611-616,共6页Radiologic Practice
摘 要:目的:探讨超高b值扩散峰度成像(DKI)对前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断及肿瘤分级评估价值。方法:回顾性分析经病理证实的63例PCa及39例前列腺增生(BPH)患者的术前DWI图像。计算癌灶及良性病灶的表观扩散系数(ADC_(3000))、DKI扩散系数(D_(7b))及峰度系数(K)。依据术后病理结果,将63例PCa患者分为低危组(Gleason评分=3+3、3+4)、中危组(Gleason评分=4+3、4+4)及高危组(Gleason评分≥9),比较低、中、高危组前列腺癌组织的D_(7b)、K及ADC_(3000)值,分析DKI预测PCa组织Gleason评分的能力。结果:外周带:39例癌灶的平均K值较39例良性病灶高,ADC_(3000)及D_(7b)值较良性病灶低,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。DKI(D+K)及ADC_(3000)诊断外周带PCa的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.968及0.971。移行带:24例癌灶的平均K值较39例BPH高,ADC_(3000)及D_(7b)值较BPH低,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01)。DKI(D+K)及ADC_(3000)诊断移行带PCa的AUC分别为0.963及0.955。低危组PCa的平均D、ADC_(3000)值与中、高危组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),低危组PCa的平均K值仅与高危组差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:b值最高为4000 s/mm^(2)时,DKI模型可用于PCa的鉴别诊断及肿瘤分级评估;相比ADC_(3000),DKI模型尚不能提供更多的临床诊断信息。Objective:To investigate the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging(DKI)for detection and grading of prostate cancer(PCa).Methods:The retrospective study included 102 patients with histopathological results(39 with benign prostate hyperplasia(BPH)and/or prostatitis,63 with prostate cancer).All patients underwent preoperative DWI with 7 b-value ranging from 0 to 4000s/mm^(2).ADC,D_(7b),K values were calculated.The PCa lesions were classified as low,indeterminate,and high risk groups according to Gleason scores.ADC,D and K values were compared between benign lesions and PCa.Quantitative DKI parameters were further compared among low,indeterminate,and high risk groups.Results:DKI parameters exhibited significant differences between benign lesions and PCa.The mean ADC_(3000) and D_(7b) values in PZ and TZ tumors were significantly lower than those in other benign peripheral region and BPH(P<0.01),and K significantly increased(P<0.01).Lower ADC,D_(7b) and higher K values were significantly associated with higher tumor Gleason grades(P<0.01).Combination of D and K yielded the largest area under curve(AUC)for PZ and TZ tumors differentiation,but there was no significant difference comparing to ADC alone(P>0.05).Conclusion:DKI may be valuable for characterization and grading of prostate carcinoma both in PZ and TZ.No additional benefits exists in comparison with conventional ADC measurements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15